В. Г. Гузев. Избранное

579 Subjunctive mood (thought-mood) in Turkish ğıracakmış “they say that he will shout” turns into a word form adding meaning of “indirectness modality” to that of the future tense meaning. (42) — Canım öyle yandı ki! Nerdeyse ağla-yacaktı-m. (informant) “—I hurt myself in such a way that I was about to cry.” In this sentence, subjunctive modality sense is expressed by lexi- cal method through the usage of nerdeyse “almost, nearly, about to”. If we get rid of the word of nerdeyse “almost, nearly, about to”, then the sentence can be evaluated as an indicative word form. Conclusion An analysis of materials in Turkish shows that forms of subjunctive mood -(E/İ)r idi (its negative form -mEz idi) and -(y)EcEk idi are compound mor- phemes and that they can be used in simple sentences or in the main clauses of compound sentences. In addition, this analysis reveals that “subjunctive modality” senses/nuances (thought images) can be strengthened lexically with word and word groups such as az daha/kaldı/kalsın “almost, nearly, about to”, belki “maybe”, nerdeyse “almost, nearly, about to”, ramak kaldı “be within an ace of” etc. In Turkish, predicate category has a mechanism of form conjugation. Since mood categories are subcategories of category of predicate, all mood categories including the subjunctive mood carry a mechanism of form conjugation. To put it differently, -(E/İ)r idi (its negative form -mEz idi) and -(y)EcEk idi forms have six personal endings, namely these forms are conjugated for six persons. To sum up, subjunctive mood informs that the action, which was necessary, probable, or possible, actually has not taken place. In other words, subjunctive mood demonstrates that the utterance content does not overlap with reality. This mood is made by morphemes of -(E/İ)r idi (its negative -mEz idi) and -(y)EcEk idi and it is a group of finite verb forms composed of two special categories. References 1. Kondakov Nikolay 1. Logicheskiy slovar’. Moskva: İzdatel’stvo “Nauka”, 1971. 566 p. 2. Deniz Yılmaz Özlem. “Türkçe Kelime Çekimi Ulamları Dizgesi Üzerine: Ad Çekimi Ulamları”. Dil Araştırmaları. № 10. Ankara, 2012. P. 123–139. 3. Guzev Viktor G. “O razgranichenii ponyatiy “finitnaya forma” i “lichnaya forma”“. Vostokovedeniye. Otvetstvennıye redaktorı V. G. Guzev, O. B. Frolova. Vıpusk 18. Sank-Peterburg, 1993. P. 36–42.